<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underused Plugin Function</title>
	<atom:link href="http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/comment-page-1/#comment-9155</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epicalex.com/?p=107#comment-9155</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen, Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it, even if it is negative!! My problem was a classic copy and paste issue - Was using some code in one of my plugins as well as other stuff from around the web and function names etc got a bit muddled, and I hadn&#039;t noticed!

I&#039;ve updated the article, and hopefully everything should now be in order...?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen, Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it, even if it is negative!! My problem was a classic copy and paste issue &#8211; Was using some code in one of my plugins as well as other stuff from around the web and function names etc got a bit muddled, and I hadn&#8217;t noticed!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve updated the article, and hopefully everything should now be in order&#8230;?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Cronin</title>
		<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/comment-page-1/#comment-8939</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epicalex.com/?p=107#comment-8939</guid>
		<description>Also, I suspect you need to remove the $plugin from the 2.7 add_filter line at the bottom. You appear to be appending plugin_basename(__FILE__) directly, instead of via the $plugin variable (as you did earlier in the post).

Actually, there appear to be bigger problems here. For example, the nue_actlinks does have the elseif functionality I talked about in my first comment, but nothing appears to call this function (certainly the add_filter lines don&#039;t call it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I suspect you need to remove the $plugin from the 2.7 add_filter line at the bottom. You appear to be appending plugin_basename(__FILE__) directly, instead of via the $plugin variable (as you did earlier in the post).</p>
<p>Actually, there appear to be bigger problems here. For example, the nue_actlinks does have the elseif functionality I talked about in my first comment, but nothing appears to call this function (certainly the add_filter lines don&#8217;t call it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Cronin</title>
		<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/comment-page-1/#comment-8938</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epicalex.com/?p=107#comment-8938</guid>
		<description>Umm, haven&#039;t tried this yet, but I&#039;m not sure about your code at the end (checking for the post_class and plugin_row_meta functions before adding the filters).

I&#039;m sure it works, but wouldn&#039;t it be better to do the following (pseudo code):

if plugin_row_meta exists, add the filter for 2.8
elseif post_class exists, add the filter for 2.7

As it stands, 2.8 would trigger both if statements and therefore add both filters (unless they&#039;ve removed the post_class function in 2.8 which is unlikely). I know the filter for 2.7 won&#039;t actually do anything in 2.8, but surely it would be better not to add the 2.7 filter if we&#039;re running 2.8?

Anyway, sorry to be negative, because this looks like it will be a great help to me in figuring out how to do this. So Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, haven&#8217;t tried this yet, but I&#8217;m not sure about your code at the end (checking for the post_class and plugin_row_meta functions before adding the filters).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it works, but wouldn&#8217;t it be better to do the following (pseudo code):</p>
<p>if plugin_row_meta exists, add the filter for 2.8<br />
elseif post_class exists, add the filter for 2.7</p>
<p>As it stands, 2.8 would trigger both if statements and therefore add both filters (unless they&#8217;ve removed the post_class function in 2.8 which is unlikely). I know the filter for 2.7 won&#8217;t actually do anything in 2.8, but surely it would be better not to add the 2.7 filter if we&#8217;re running 2.8?</p>
<p>Anyway, sorry to be negative, because this looks like it will be a great help to me in figuring out how to do this. So Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Underused Plugin Function &#124; Epic Alex :: Web Design &#124; New WP Themes - WordPress News</title>
		<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/comment-page-1/#comment-8052</link>
		<dc:creator>Underused Plugin Function &#124; Epic Alex :: Web Design &#124; New WP Themes - WordPress News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epicalex.com/?p=107#comment-8052</guid>
		<description>[...] here: Underused Plugin Function &#124; Epic Alex :: Web Design   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here: Underused Plugin Function | Epic Alex :: Web Design   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XIII</title>
		<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/comment-page-1/#comment-7867</link>
		<dc:creator>XIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epicalex.com/?p=107#comment-7867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a user who thinks it&#039;s a great idea as it saves a few clicks checking for new settings every time we install or upgrade a plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a user who thinks it&#8217;s a great idea as it saves a few clicks checking for new settings every time we install or upgrade a plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress Articles for june 9 2009 &#124; WPStart.org - WordPress themes, plugins and news</title>
		<link>http://epicalex.com/underused-plugin-function/comment-page-1/#comment-7857</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Articles for june 9 2009 &#124; WPStart.org - WordPress themes, plugins and news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epicalex.com/?p=107#comment-7857</guid>
		<description>[...] Underused Plugin Function There is often a lot of talk about where WordPress plugin settings pages should be placed in the admin panels, and once the plugin author has decided where to put it, the user then has to work out where to find it. Well in WordPress 2.7, a new filters was added to solve the problem. - By Epic Alex [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Underused Plugin Function There is often a lot of talk about where WordPress plugin settings pages should be placed in the admin panels, and once the plugin author has decided where to put it, the user then has to work out where to find it. Well in WordPress 2.7, a new filters was added to solve the problem. &#8211; By Epic Alex [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

